<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns="http://my.netscape.com/rdf/simple/0.9/">

<!-- MHonArc v2.6.16 -->

  <channel>
    <title>Linux RAID Storage
</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid</link>
    <description>Email archive for Linux RAID Storage
.</description>
  </channel>
 
  <item>
    <title>Re: raid6's using not the best bandwidth method &amp;&amp; raid6 algo is significantly slower in x86_64.</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21126.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: raid6's using not the best bandwidth method &amp;&amp; raid6 algo is significantly slower in x86_64.</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21125.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>RE: raid6's using not the best bandwidth method &amp;&amp; raid6 algo is significantly slower in x86_64.</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21124.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: raid6's using not the best bandwidth method &amp;&amp; raid6 algo is significantly slower in x86_64.</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21123.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>[PATCH] Manage: kernel 2.6.18 can re-add v1 superblocks.</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21122.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RAID-6 question.</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21121.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Backups using RAID1</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21120.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>[PATCH] md: fix multipath oops</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21119.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RAID-6 question.</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21118.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: Should we be trying re-write on write errors?</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21117.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RAID-6 question.</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21116.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Calculate logical RAID-6 position from physical position</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21115.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: raid6's using not the best bandwidth method &amp;&amp; raid6 algo is significantly slower in x86_64.</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21114.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: RAID-6 question.</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21113.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>[PATCH] md: use list_for_each_entry macro directly</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21112.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>raid6's using not the best bandwidth method &amp;&amp; raid6 algo is significantly slower in x86_64.</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21111.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: 2.6.27.6 question: ata_sff_hsm_move: ata15 (why always ata15)?</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21110.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: 2.6.27.6 question: ata_sff_hsm_move: ata15 (why always ata15)?</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21109.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: 2.6.27.6 question: ata_sff_hsm_move: ata15 (why always ata15)?</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21108.html</link>
  </item>

  <item>
    <title>Re: 2.6.27.6 question: ata_sff_hsm_move: ata15 (why always ata15)?</title>
    <link>http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg21106.html</link>
  </item>

 

</rdf:RDF>
 
<!-- MHonArc v2.6.16 -->
