RE: Errata reported for RFC4173

[Black_David@xxxxxxx]

Lars,

Independent of the publication date, the work on the draft that
became this RFC significantly predates publication of RFC 3986.
The references to those two RFCs are correct, and the obsoleted
status of the RFCs can be readily determined from the RFC Editor's
database.  I do not believe it is an appropriate use of Errata
to record the fact that referenced RFCs have been obsoleted.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david@xxxxxxx        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:lars.eggert@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 7:19 AM
> To: ips@xxxxxxxx
> Subject:  Errata reported for RFC4173
> 
> Hi,
> 
> the following errata has been reported for an RFC that 
> originated with  
> this WG [*]. The transport ADs are soliciting comments on (1)  
> classifying and (2) verifying the errata below.
> 
> (1) The errata below should have a classification suggested by the  
> submitter, which will either be "technical" or editorial. We're  
> interested to hear comments on whether the current classification is  
> accurate.
> 
> (2) We're interested to hear comments on whether the errata 
> addresses  
> a valid technical or editorial issue with the published RFC, i.e.,  
> whether the errata should be rejected or accepted as verified.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lars
> 
> [*] For WGs that have concluded but whose mailing list is still  
> active, I'm assuming that some of the relevant experts will 
> hopefully  
> still be subscribed
> 
> 
> 
> RFC4173, "Bootstrapping Clients using the Internet Small Computer  
> System Interface (iSCSI) Protocol", September 2005
> 
> Status: Reported
> Type: Editorial
> 
> Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
> Date Reported: 2005-10-17
> Report Text:
> 
> Two normative references have been obsoleted:
>      RFC 2396 ( Ref. "[Lee98]" )
> and
>      RFC 2732 ( Ref. "[Hinden99]" )
> have both been obsoleted by RFC 3986 == STD 66 (published in January  
> 2005) !
> 
> Affected pieces of RFC 4173:
> - Both Ref's appear once (and together) near the bottom of 
> page 4 (in  
> the 6th-to-last line).
> - Normative References section, bottom of page 9 + top of page 10 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ips mailing list
> Ips@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips