RE: rationale to send PDUs in increasing CmdSn on single co nnection

[Paul Koning <pkoning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>>>> "Parav" == Parav Pandit <paravpandit@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

 Parav> If I take pragmatic approach, Any idea, currently how current
 Parav> single connection target implementation is?

I suspect most of them are single connection.

 Parav> I mean, if current targets are smart enough (accept out of
 Parav> order PDUs on single connection- liberal on point 3.2.2.1),
 Parav> then initiators can use their DMA optimization.  What do you
 Parav> say?

Don't.

You'd be creating an initiator that violates the protocol spec.  You'd
have no reason to expect that to work at all.  Many targets will check
this and call it a protocol violation (you may end up with the
connection terminated).  Some may not notice but may end up doing the
wrong thing.

      paul



_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips